The Bitcoin Network is 11000x Faster than the Top 500 Supercomputers Combined

I had a meeting today with an e-commerce company which believes that they can achieve anonymous shipping through Bitcoin. In it, I’ll be examining particular social structures found in the Bitcoin network. I will also discuss in the meeting of how much I’ve been dabbling in cryptocurrency Australia trading and how lucrative it’s been so far. Although he’s curious about Bitcoin, my TA doesn’t know much about it beyond what he’s seen in the press. He asked, “So just how much compute power is on the network right now?” I know that for a long time, the total hashpower of the Bitcoin network is some multiple of the top-500 supercomputers combined, so I told him just that. But I wanted to know just how big that multiple was. The number I came up with totally boggles my mind.

In late November, 2013 Forbes contributor Reuven Cohen published an article[note] “Global Bitcoin Computing Power Now 256 Times Faster Than Top 500 Supercomputers, Combined!,” Forbes, accessed December 4, 2015, http://www.forbes.com/sites/reuvencohen/2013/11/28/global-bitcoin-computing-power-now-256-times-faster-than-top-500-supercomputers-combined/.[/note] in which he found the Bitcoin network to be 256x faster than the top-500 supercomputers in the world. He found this by comparing the number of floating point operations per second (FLOPS) the Bitcoin network it theoretically capable of performing (posted at Bitcoinwatch.com) and the sum of the performance of the TOP500 supercomputer index. (He also acknowledges that it’s not quite 100% kosher to compare hashes/second to FLOPS, but he runs with it anyways. We’ll do the same here.)

Well, that was two years ago. How do the numbers compare today?

According to Bitcoinwatch.com, the Bitcoin network is currently achieving 7059965.06 petaFLOPS of compute power. The most recent list of Top500 supercomputers[note]“November 2015 | TOP500 Supercomputer Sites,” accessed December 4, 2015, http://www.top500.org/lists/2015/11/.[/note], released in November 2015, cumulatively achieves a peak performance of 642 petaFLOPS. If you divide the Bitcoin network by the TOP500, you find that the Bitcoin network is faster by a factor of 10,996.8.

So, what does this mean? Well, it’s hard to say. I take Cohen’s stance and say that these numbers are just fun to look at. But it makes you think about the computational arms race that created the modern Bitcoin network. If Bitcoin (and cryptocurrencies in general) are such young technologies, and the network’s total compute power is several orders of magnitude greater than the peak performers in the supercomputing space, one is left to wonder what that network will look like years from now, assuming it persists at all.

 Footnotes

Comments

16 responses to “The Bitcoin Network is 11000x Faster than the Top 500 Supercomputers Combined”

  1. […] the bitcoin mining industry uses data centers full of custom chips that collectively dwarf the largest supercomputers. All doing essentially nothing except being expensive, which turns out to be a foolproof method of […]

  2. […] La minería de Bitcoin no se hace por caridad. La “codicia” de los mineros (mejor llamarla búsqueda de ganancias) es precisamente lo que ha permitido a la red de Bitcoin convertirse en el sistema de computación más potente del mundo, con miles de veces más poder computacional que los 500 supercomputadores del mundo combinados. […]

  3. […] so would require an electrical supply sufficient to power a small country. The bitcoin network has long performed more PetaFLOPS than the top 500 supercomputers on the planet […]

  4. […] so would require an electrical supply sufficient to power a small country. The bitcoin network has long performed more PetaFLOPS than the top 500 supercomputers on the planet […]

  5. […] so would require an electrical supply sufficient to power a small country. The bitcoin network has long performed more PetaFLOPS than the top 500 supercomputers on the planet […]

  6. Seems this growth is pretty exponential – I just re-did that with latest numbers and it’s almost sixty-four thousand times (63 808) faster. Agreed that it’s not particularly useful, but fascinating (:

    1. Again, I was very careful to mention in my post that it’s mostly a useless measure (because FLOPs don’t translate well to SHA-256 hashes, even on CPUs, let alone ASICs)

      It’s still a fun comparison to make though.

      I’m now really tempted to devise a kind of dashboard that tracks the multiple.

      1. I think this is a useful comparison in the sense that it shows how utterly futileit would be for any individual or government to take control of the network with their supercomputers. Unless they have a secret stock pile of billions of ASICs just waiting to come online..

  7. […] just like bitcoin provides the incentives for computers all around the world to run the most powerful computing network in the world — more than 500 Googles or 10,000 of the world’s fastest supercomputers — what if the […]

  8. […] that leave supercomputers super-far behind. Bitcoin networks have a computing power of more than 2 million petaFLOPS per second (measure system of computer […]

  9. […] atrai mais poder computacional para validação da rede. Resultado disso é que a rede de bitcoin tem o maior poder computacional do mundo e tende com o tempo a ser cada vez mais forte devido a estes incentivos econômicos […]

  10. […] Wie viel ist das im Vergleich zu Supercomputer? Die Rechenpower von Supercomputer wird in FLOPS angegeben. FLOPS lassen sich nicht direkt mit dem Berechnen von Hashes vergleichen. Es muss eine Umrechnung erfolgen. Als Endergebnis bleibt: Die Bitcoin-Blockchain hat ein Vielfaches an Rechenpower im Vergleich zu allen Top 500 Supercomputer zusammen. […]

  11. […] [3] Bitcoin Hashrate and Bitcoin Network Speed […]

  12. […] Bitcoin Hashrate and Bitcoin Network Speed […]

Leave a Reply